lunes, 6 de mayo de 2013

That's all folks!

No doubt this is going to be the saddest blog post.

My USA learning experiencie, has arrive to its end. Tomorrow I'll leave and go back to Spain. On the one hand I am happy for returning home. On the other hand, I am really sad. It is hard to say "goodbye" to that much great people I've met here. You know? Probably you won't see them never, ever in your life. And that's too sad.

First of all, thank you very very very much Prof. L. K for your treatment. I've been here like a King: every single day has been a new adventure, new challenges. Always learning. I really really appreciate your time, your shared knowledge and your hospitality. I've no words in English to really express how grateful I feel to you. Thank you. And that, of course, includes C. T.

Thank you very much Mike, I really appreciate your time. You've been making my life easier here, picking me up, driving me up, showing me your field work and sharing your knowledge both in science and in american culture. Thank you very much, friend.

Also thank you all Michelle, Jesse, Adam and Danielle. I am so glad for having met you guys. I hope we'll met again, maybe in Spain.

Of course, thank you very much to Domingo M.; who gave me this opportunity, making it possible in less than ten days. Working hard answering my thousand questions and fighting with my hundred fears. Pushing me to be here! I totally appreciate this present you gave me, your time doing it possible. Thank you very much.

Finally, thank you everyone who has followed this blog and especially the ones who had left their comments.

I'll write another post, but just about general things that happen to me here; funny things and also weird things. So that won't be a serious post.

Thank you all and see you soon...

domingo, 5 de mayo de 2013

The begining of the end

Hello again guys,

How are your doing? I hope you are doing great. Here I am starting to feel sad. That's close to finish. In four days I will be back in Spain, and my USA learning experience will arrive to its end. Actually, only the face part, because there are still many things to think about, to "ferment" in my brain. Therefore, the learning part will be always with me.

I have many things to speak about, so I don't know where to start. Let's see a couple of photos showing fire effects:








I took those only two days after doing FF80 prescribed burn, in Lakeland, GA. As you can see, Serenoa repens is fully fire adapted. Besides being really flamable, it starts to resprout in only a few duys after the burn. The trunk is horizontaly-oriented and it's really fire-resilient. That species recolonizes fastly burned plots.

In this other pictures, you can see some fire severity visual indicators:





They are not the most accuratest ones, but they are useful and fast to see and interpret. You can pay attention to the scorching height, to the ground cover consumption and to the soil impacts. Also, you can make a overall rating of the impacts in the landscape. It is really impresive how much we can learn only taking a look over a recently burned area. In two photos we have enough information for being speaking two days. Even though this is a little plot and not the best example, you can find some interesting things.

Let's go ahead and talk about the firing techniques. That is one of the most important things when planing a burn in situ. I mean, not making the plan, but deciding how to implement it. There are some statements that you shouldn't include in your plan; you have to write those by and large. For example, the firing techniques. You have to ve flexible, because the field conditions may differ from forecasted ones. Therfore, adapting firing techniques is essential. While it is true that in the same plot, with the same conditions, and the same crew, you can expecto to use the same techniques, you should not be tempted not to reassess continuously your plan. Hence, you have to know all the firing techniques and its safe way of implementation.

(*) remember: 1 chain = 66 feet = 22 meters.

1.- Backing fire:

A backing fire is started along a baseline (anchor point), such as a road, plow line, stream or other barrier, and allowed to back into the wind. Variations in windspeed have little effect on the rate of spread of a fire burning into the wind. Such fires proceed at a speed of 1 to 3 chains per hour. Backing fire is the easiest and safest type of prescribed fire to use, provided windspeed and direction are steady. It produces minimum scorch and lends itself to use in heavy fuels and young pine stands.


2.- Strip-Heading fire:

In strip-headfiring, a series of lines of fire are set progressively upwind of a firebreak in such a manner that no individual line of fire can develop to a high energy level before it reaches either a firebreak or another line of fire. A backing fire is generally used to secure the base line and the remainder of the area then treated with strip-heading fires. Strips are often set 1 to 3 chains apart. The distance between ignition lines is determined by the desired flame length. This distance can be varied within a fire to adjust for slight changes in topography, stand density, weather, or the type, amount or distribution of fuel.

3.- Flanking fire:

The flanking-fire technique consists of treating an area with lines of fire set directly into the wind. The lines spread at right angles to the wind. This technique requires considerable knowledge of fire behavior, particularly if used by itself. It is used quite often to secure the flanks of a strip-heading fire or backing fire as it progresses. It is sometimes used to supplement a backing fire in areas of light fuel or under more humid weather conditions. It is useful on a small area or to facilitate burning a large area in a relatively short time when a line-heading fire would be too intense.

This method of firing can stand little variation in wind direction and requires expert crew coordination and timing. For safety, all lines of flank fire should be ignited simultaneously and all torch people should keep abreast of one another.

4.- Point Source fires:

A prudent burning boss will often switch from strip-heading fires to point source fires as the day progresses and continuous lines of fire become too intense. When properly executed, a grid of spot ignitions will produce a fire with an intensity much greater than that of a line-backing fire but somewhat less than that of a line-heading fire. Timing and spacing of the individual ignition spots are the keys to the successful application of this method. First a line backing fire is ignited across the downwind side of the block and allowed to back 10 to 20 feet into the block to increase the effective width of the control line. A line of spots is then ignited at some specified distance upwind of the backing fire and the process continued until the whole block has been ignited.

To minimize crown scorch, ignition-grid spacing is selected to allow the spots along a line to head into the rear of the spots along the downwind line before the flanks of the individual spots merge to form a continuous flame front. The merger of successive ignition lines thus takes place along a moving point rather than along a whole line at the same time. Merger along a moving point can be ensured by beginning with a closely spaced square grid (2 chains by 2 chains is recommended).

It is important to say that this is a general and generical description. That means that you can combine techniques and that you MUST adapt them to your own conditions. Also that each of them can be built using another one. For example, you can do a backing fire control line/black area using strip-heading fire to make it wider. Also, if doing ignitions Fire Boss realises that strip-heading fire generates too much intense fire behavoir and point-source ignitions are not enough, he/she can ask the ligthers to use dashes (that means: dash of X meters on fire, hole of Y meters without fire,...). You have to be flexible and always pay atention to the changes in weather!

Those are the main firing techniques you'll use in most of the prescribed burns. However, there are more. Even though they are not as usual as the previous ones, they're sometimes useful, so we have to know them.

5.- Aerial Ignition:

When ground ignition techniques are used, the downwind spots will usually coalesce and burn out before the whole block has been ignited. In contrast, aerial firing permits ignition of a block to be completed before the downwind spots have burned out. This does not present a problem at the damp end of the prescribed burning window when actual fine-fuel moisture is near 20 percent. Rapid ignition of a block reduces both flying time and the time needed to complete the burn. However, when using aerial ignition techniques under "traditional" ideal burning conditions for line-backing fires with actual fine-fuel moisture near 10 percent, rapid ignition of the entire area can result in an increase in fire intensity to unacceptable levels. You would then have little recourse except to let the area burn out and hope that damage is limited to just a loss in overstory growth.

Some experienced burners start firing early in the day, before the fuel is dry enough to carry fire well. They reduce the distance between spots within a line to less than 2 chains by 2 chains. The increased number of ignitions creates more heat and helps dry the surface fuels, especially when a helitorch is used. The distance between spots must be expanded as the morning progresses and burning conditions improve. Otherwise, the spots will merge laterally forming lines of heading fire that get too intense before reaching the next downwind line of ignition points. The distance between lines can also be increased as necessary to maintain a square ignition grid.

6.- Center and Circular (Ring) firing:

This technique is useful on cutover areas where a hot fire is needed to reduce or eliminate logging debris prior to seeding or planting. It works best when winds, if any, are light and variable. This procedure should never be used for underburning because of the likelihood of severe tree damage as the flame fronts merge.

7.- Pile and Windrow burning:

The objective of piling logging debris before burning it is to prolong fire residence time on a restricted area so that larger materials have time to be consumed. Some areas will contain an unacceptable amount of large, scattered debris that must be concentrated to ensure consumption. This material should be piled and not windrowed. Windrowing can reduce site quality by removing topsoil. Piedmont soils are also susceptible to compaction from the heavy equipment used, especially during wet weather. Full exposure of the soil to the sun and rain bakes the top layer. Furthermore, the direct force of raindrops will clog soil pores and often results in erosion on steep slopes. The area beneath the windrows is lost to production because the debris is rarely consumed completely and what remains makes planting difficult or impossible. Even when windrows contain breaks spaced every couple of chains, they still present a barrier to firefighting equipment and wildlife.

If you want to read more about that techniques (all of them), there are many prescribed burning guides which explain them. I've took that information from a Forest Service Southern Region technical publication (USDA).

Besides both having a good weather forecast and paying attention to changes in weather, you can improve your planning and implementation by being used to your fuels. The more you know about them, the more accurate will be your burn and the less unwanted results you'll have. That's why I recommend you to use, in adittion to Rothermel's thirteen, the Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models:


I hope you enjoy!